<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Ethics in Business</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5110" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5110</id>
<updated>2013-05-23T23:02:25Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-05-23T23:02:25Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Teaching Business Ethics: A Faculty Seminar Model</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5111" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Grinols, Anne Bradstreet</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5111</id>
<updated>2008-08-11T23:19:46Z</updated>
<published>2007-12-20T15:51:32Z</published>
<summary type="text">Teaching Business Ethics: A Faculty Seminar Model
Grinols, Anne Bradstreet
Who is responsible for the increasing incidence of ethical misconduct in businesses? The short &#13;
answer: the ones who committed the ethical misconduct are responsible.  As these incidents receive &#13;
more and more coverage in the news, however, it is fair to ask if there is shared responsibility.  Does &#13;
some of that responsibility fall to those who teach business?  Is teaching the ethics of doing business &#13;
deemed just as necessary as the requisite accounting, finance, and management skills?  How should &#13;
business schools respond to the call for more ethics training in their graduates?
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-12-20T15:51:32Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
