<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5110">
<title>Ethics in Business</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5110</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5111"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2013-05-22T07:32:58Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5111">
<title>Teaching Business Ethics: A Faculty Seminar Model</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5111</link>
<description>Teaching Business Ethics: A Faculty Seminar Model
Grinols, Anne Bradstreet
Who is responsible for the increasing incidence of ethical misconduct in businesses? The short &#13;
answer: the ones who committed the ethical misconduct are responsible.  As these incidents receive &#13;
more and more coverage in the news, however, it is fair to ask if there is shared responsibility.  Does &#13;
some of that responsibility fall to those who teach business?  Is teaching the ethics of doing business &#13;
deemed just as necessary as the requisite accounting, finance, and management skills?  How should &#13;
business schools respond to the call for more ethics training in their graduates?
</description>
<dc:date>2007-12-20T15:51:32Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
