The negotiation of conflict management in long-distance and geographically close romantic relationships.

DSpace/Manakin Repository

BEARdocs is currently undergoing a scheduled upgrade. We expect the upgrade to be completed no later than Monday, March 2nd, 2015. During this time you will be able to access existing documents, but will not be able to log in or submit new documents.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Morman, Mark T. Reys, Whitney J.
dc.contributor.other Baylor University. Dept. of Communication Studies. en 2011-05
dc.description.abstract This study examines conflict management strategy use in long-distance dating relationships (LDDRs) compared to conflict management strategy use in geographically close dating relationships (GCDRs). Uncertainty Reduction Theory posits that uncertainty could be problematic for LDDRs and thus contribute to differences in conflict management styles. This study applied the conceptualization of Peterson’s (1983) conflict management strategies to the context of dating relationships. The purpose of this study was to determine differences between conflict management in LDDRs and GCDRs. This study also seeked to measure the satisfaction, commitment, and closeness felt by individuals who used each conflict management strategy. Results indicated that individuals in LDDRs and GCDRs report using the same conflict management strategies at the same rates. Thus, no differences were found in conflict management styles between couples in LDDRs and GCDRs. These results invite future exploration on the topic of LDDR conflict management. en
dc.rights Baylor University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact for inquiries about permission. en
dc.subject Long-distance relationships. en
dc.subject Romance. en
dc.subject Conflict. en
dc.title The negotiation of conflict management in long-distance and geographically close romantic relationships. en
dc.type Thesis en M.A. en
dc.rights.accessrights Worldwide access en
dc.contributor.department Communication Studies. en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BEARdocs

Advanced Search


My Account