BEARdocs

Review-by-Few or Review-by-Many?

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Maurer, Peter
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2104/8183
dc.description.abstract It’s clear that traditional forms of academic publication are rapidly becoming obsolete. It’s also clear that peer review is a seriously flawed process that could be much improved upon by modern methods of communication. The primary flaw in the peer review process is that it gathers the opinions of a small group (two-to-four) of individuals, and attempts to make a decision based on that sample. It is my contention, that, except in rare cases, this decision is based on too small a sample to be valid. In this opinion piece, I suggest a method for gathering reviews from a wider group of people with the aim of improving the decision-making process. en
dc.subject Peer Review en
dc.subject Alternative Review Strategies en
dc.title Review-by-Few or Review-by-Many? en
dc.license GPL en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BEARdocs


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics